head to head · open source
shardingsphere vs Etl.Net
shardingsphere has 20,817 GitHub stars, 6,906 forks, 197 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Etl.Net has 813 stars, 106 forks, 46 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. shardingsphere leads on adoption by 2,461% (20,817 vs 813 stars). shardingsphere is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Etl.Net is written in C# under MIT. shardingsphere has attracted 33% as many forks as stars, Etl.Net 13%. shardingsphere was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| shardingsphere | Etl.Net | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 813 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | C# |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 6.9K | ⑂ 106 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick shardingsphere if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Etl.Net if
- You want the Etl.Net feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C#
- You evaluated both and Etl.Net fits your workflow better
About shardingsphere
Apache ShardingSphere Enterprise Distributed Database Ecosystem Building the standards and ecosystem on top of heterogeneous databases, empowering enterprise data architecture transformation Official Website: OVERVIEW Apache ShardingSphere is positioned as Database Plus , a standard and ecosystem built on top of heterogeneous databases. As an operating system layer above databases, ShardingSphere does not create new databases but focuses on maximizing the computing capabilities of existing databases, providing unified data access and enhanced computing capabilities. Database Plus Core Concept : By building a…
read the full shardingsphere overview →
About Etl.Net
Etl.Net Go to full documentation :rotating light: I need some help!!! :ambulance: I need some serious help for the following subject: :books: Documentation. The website of ETL.NET needs to be completed. It contains the essential to start and get in touch, but a dramatic amount of serious features is not documented in there. :heavy check mark: Unit tests. A proper test code coverage is the only real way to be taken seriously when it is about selecting the right open source library. There was a time when some units tests existed only for the reactive engine of the core (Paillave.EtlNet.Core). But it happened I had…
read the full Etl.Net overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Engineering & Integration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is shardingsphere or Etl.Net more popular?
shardingsphere has 20,817 GitHub stars and Etl.Net has 813. shardingsphere has the larger community by that measure.
Are shardingsphere and Etl.Net free?
Both are open source. shardingsphere is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Etl.Net under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between shardingsphere and Etl.Net?
shardingsphere is written in Java and Etl.Net in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, shardingsphere or Etl.Net?
Choose shardingsphere if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Etl.Net if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.