head to head · open source

server vs dingo

server has 8,250 GitHub stars, 2,105 forks, 495 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dingo has 1,704 stars, 264 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. server leads on adoption by 384% (8,250 vs 1,704 stars). server is written in C++ under GPL-2.0; dingo is written in Java under Apache-2.0. server has attracted 26% as many forks as stars, dingo 15%. server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

server ★ 8.3K dingo ★ 1.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

server dingo
GitHub stars ★ 8.3K ★ 1.7K
License GPL-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C++ Java
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-07-10
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 264
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick server if

  • You weight community size — 8.3K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full server profile →

pick dingo if

  • You want the dingo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and dingo fits your workflow better

full dingo profile →

About server

MariaDB Server is a community developed, GPL 2.0 relational database server forked from MySQL by the original MySQL developers, aimed at teams that want MySQL compatibility with a sanely licensed, independently governed SQL server.

read the full server overview →

About dingo

DingoDB is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Java based distributed multi modal vector database from DataCanvas that unifies relational and vector semantics behind a MySQL compatible SQL interface, built for teams that need hybrid scalar and vector queries over structured and unstructured data at high concurrency and ultra low latency.

read the full dingo overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More Machine Learning Infrastructure projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Machine Learning Infrastructure field.

server vs Ollama server vs llama.cpp server vs vllm server vs GPT4All server vs llama_index server vs LocalAI server vs faiss server vs PageIndex server vs Langfuse server vs cognee server vs taipy server vs dagster

Frequently asked questions

Is server or dingo more popular?

server has 8,250 GitHub stars and dingo has 1,704. server has the larger community by that measure.

Are server and dingo free?

Both are open source. server is licensed under GPL-2.0 and dingo under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between server and dingo?

server is written in C++ and dingo in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, server or dingo?

Choose server if you want the larger community (8,250 stars) or its GPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose dingo if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.