head to head · open source
dots vs SeleniumBase
dots has 32,383 GitHub stars, 4,739 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. SeleniumBase has 13,222 stars, 1,612 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped yesterday. dots leads on adoption by 145% (32,383 vs 13,222 stars). dots is written in TypeScript under MIT; SeleniumBase is written in Python under MIT. dots has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, SeleniumBase 12%. SeleniumBase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| dots | SeleniumBase | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 13K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.7K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick dots if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick SeleniumBase if
- You want the SeleniumBase feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and SeleniumBase fits your workflow better
About dots
dots Every AI agent is a model and a browser. You can swap the model with one flag. The browser is what the website sees. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open The conversation on the left, the browser on the right, live. It all comes down to the browser When a web agent fails, the model is rarely why. The page never loaded, a challenge appeared, the login expired, the click did not land. All of that happens in the browser, before the model gets to think. So dots is built around one: A real Firefox engine, patched in C++. The fingerprint is decided inside the engine, not painted over with JavaScript that a…
About SeleniumBase
All in one Browser Automation Framework: Web Crawling / Testing / Scraping / Stealth 🚀 Start 🏰 Features 🎛️ Options 📚 Examples 💻 Scripts 🗾 Locale 📗 API 📘 Stealth API 🔠 DesignPatterns 🔴 Recorder 📊 Dashboard 🎖️ GUI 📰 TestPage 👤 UC Mode 🐙 CDP Mode 📶 Charts 🖥️ Farm 👁️ How 🚝 Migration 🎭 Stealthy Playwright 🛂 MasterQA 🚎 Tours 🤖 MCP 🟨 JS Mgr 🌏 Translator 🎞️ Presenter 🖼️ Visual 🗂️ CPlans 🐙 CDP Mode bypasses bot detection with Chromium based browsers. 🎭 Stealthy Playwright Mode extends CDP Mode's stealth to Playwright. pip install seleniumbase for the main framework. (Or use uv add ) pip…
read the full SeleniumBase overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is dots or SeleniumBase more popular?
dots has 32,383 GitHub stars and SeleniumBase has 13,222. dots has the larger community by that measure.
Are dots and SeleniumBase free?
Both are open source. dots is licensed under MIT and SeleniumBase under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between dots and SeleniumBase?
dots is written in TypeScript and SeleniumBase in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, dots or SeleniumBase?
Choose dots if you want the larger community (32,383 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SeleniumBase if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.