head to head · open source

CloudQuery vs Seal-Report

CloudQuery has 6,521 GitHub stars, 558 forks, 166 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Seal-Report has 1,635 stars, 508 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CloudQuery leads on adoption by 299% (6,521 vs 1,635 stars). CloudQuery is written in Go under MPL-2.0; Seal-Report is written in C# under MIT. CloudQuery has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Seal-Report 31%. CloudQuery was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

CloudQuery ★ 6.5K Seal-Report ★ 1.6K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

CloudQuery Seal-Report
GitHub stars ★ 6.5K ★ 1.6K
License MPL-2.0 MIT
Written in Go C#
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 558 ⑂ 508
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick CloudQuery if

  • You weight community size — 6.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full CloudQuery profile →

pick Seal-Report if

  • You want the Seal-Report feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and Seal-Report fits your workflow better

full Seal-Report profile →

About CloudQuery

CloudQuery is an open source, Go based cloud asset inventory and ELT tool, licensed under MPL 2.0, that syncs metadata from AWS, Azure, GCP, and more than 70 cloud and SaaS sources into a data warehouse so platform, security, and FinOps teams can query it with SQL.

read the full CloudQuery overview →

About Seal-Report

Seal Report & Task is open source database reporting and task framework written in C for Microsoft .NET. It lives in Data & Analytics and Data Engineering & Integration. It targets reports from SQL and NoSQL sources, plus ETL and batch tasks. License is MIT.

read the full Seal-Report overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

CloudQuery vs Airbyte CloudQuery vs Cube CloudQuery vs shardingsphere CloudQuery vs debezium CloudQuery vs CocoIndex CloudQuery vs seatunnel CloudQuery vs steampipe CloudQuery vs realtime CloudQuery vs flink-cdc CloudQuery vs Lightdash CloudQuery vs fluvio CloudQuery vs whodb

Frequently asked questions

Is CloudQuery or Seal-Report more popular?

CloudQuery has 6,521 GitHub stars and Seal-Report has 1,635. CloudQuery has the larger community by that measure.

Are CloudQuery and Seal-Report free?

Both are open source. CloudQuery is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Seal-Report under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between CloudQuery and Seal-Report?

CloudQuery is written in Go and Seal-Report in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, CloudQuery or Seal-Report?

Choose CloudQuery if you want the larger community (6,521 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose Seal-Report if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.