head to head · open source
Cherry Studio vs screenpipe
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars, 5,164 forks, 1,514 open issues and last shipped yesterday. screenpipe has 22,209 stars, 2,263 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Cherry Studio leads on adoption by 140% (53,202 vs 22,209 stars). Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; screenpipe is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. Cherry Studio has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, screenpipe 10%. Cherry Studio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Cherry Studio | screenpipe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 53K | ★ 22K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Cherry Studio if
- You weight community size — 53K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick screenpipe if
- You want the screenpipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and screenpipe fits your workflow better
About Cherry Studio
English Official Site Documents Development Feedback [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][twitter shield]][twitter link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][telegram shield]][telegram link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github nightly shield]][github nightly link] [![][github contributors shield]][github contributors link] [![][license shield]][license link] [![][commercial shield]][commercial link] [![][sponsor shield]][sponsor link] 🍒 Cherry Studio Cherry Studio is a desktop client that supports multiple LLM providers, available on Windows, Mac and Linux. 👏 Join Telegram…
read the full Cherry Studio overview →
About screenpipe
DOWNLOAD SCREENPIPE [ screenpipe YC S26 ] Screenpipe remembers how you actually work Record your screen continuously locally and provide context to your agents (Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, Runner...) what is this? screenpipe capture all your computer work locally and power your agents remember everything never forget what you saw, heard, or did run agents that work based on what you do generate agents, skills, and automations based on what you do search with ai find anything using natural language 100% local your data lives on your machine only source available inspect, modify, audit (LICENSE.md) company…
read the full screenpipe overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Cherry Studio or screenpipe more popular?
Cherry Studio has 53,202 GitHub stars and screenpipe has 22,209. Cherry Studio has the larger community by that measure.
Are Cherry Studio and screenpipe free?
Both are open source. Cherry Studio is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and screenpipe has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Cherry Studio and screenpipe ?
Cherry Studio is written in TypeScript and screenpipe in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Cherry Studio or screenpipe ?
Choose Cherry Studio if you want the larger community (53,202 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose screenpipe if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.