head to head · open source
scrapy vs wreq-python
scrapy has 65,180 GitHub stars, 12,093 forks, 394 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wreq-python has 1,505 stars, 127 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. scrapy leads on adoption by 4,231% (65,180 vs 1,505 stars). scrapy is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; wreq-python is written in Python under Apache-2.0. scrapy has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, wreq-python 8%. scrapy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (crawler, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| scrapy | wreq-python | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 127 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick scrapy if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq-python if
- You want the wreq-python feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and wreq-python fits your workflow better
About scrapy
.. logo image:: :target: :alt: Scrapy :width: 480px .. version image:: :target: :alt: PyPI Version .. python version image:: :target: :alt: Supported Python Versions .. tests image:: :target: :alt: Tests .. coverage image:: :target: :alt: Coverage report .. conda image:: :target: :alt: Conda Version .. deepwiki image:: :target: :alt: Ask DeepWiki Scrapy is a web scraping framework to extract structured data from websites. It is cross platform, and requires Python 3.10+. It is maintained by Zyte (formerly Scrapinghub) and many other contributors . .. many other contributors: .. Scrapy: .. Zyte: Install with…
read the full scrapy overview →
About wreq-python
wreq [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [discord badge]: [discord url]: 🚀 Help me work seamlessly with open source sharing by sponsoring me on GitHub An ergonomic and modular Python HTTP Client for high fidelity protocol matching, featuring customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities, powered by wreq. Features Async and Blocking Client s Plain bodies, JSON, urlencoded, multipart HTTP Trailer Cookie Store Redirect Policy Original Header Rotating Proxies Connection Pooling Streaming Transfers Zero Copy Transfers WebSocket Upgrade HTTPS via BoringSSL Free Threaded Safety Automatic…
read the full wreq-python overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is scrapy or wreq-python more popular?
scrapy has 65,180 GitHub stars and wreq-python has 1,505. scrapy has the larger community by that measure.
Are scrapy and wreq-python free?
Both are open source. scrapy is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and wreq-python under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between scrapy and wreq-python?
scrapy is written in Python and wreq-python in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, scrapy or wreq-python?
Choose scrapy if you want the larger community (65,180 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose wreq-python if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.