head to head · open source
scrapy vs wreq
scrapy has 65,180 GitHub stars, 12,093 forks, 394 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wreq has 1,092 stars, 140 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. scrapy leads on adoption by 5,869% (65,180 vs 1,092 stars). scrapy is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause; wreq is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. scrapy has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, wreq 13%. scrapy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| scrapy | wreq | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 65K | ★ 1.1K |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 12K | ⑂ 140 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick scrapy if
- You weight community size — 65K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick wreq if
- You want the wreq feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and wreq fits your workflow better
About scrapy
.. logo image:: :target: :alt: Scrapy :width: 480px .. version image:: :target: :alt: PyPI Version .. python version image:: :target: :alt: Supported Python Versions .. tests image:: :target: :alt: Tests .. coverage image:: :target: :alt: Coverage report .. conda image:: :target: :alt: Conda Version .. deepwiki image:: :target: :alt: Ask DeepWiki Scrapy is a web scraping framework to extract structured data from websites. It is cross platform, and requires Python 3.10+. It is maintained by Zyte (formerly Scrapinghub) and many other contributors . .. many other contributors: .. Scrapy: .. Zyte: Install with…
read the full scrapy overview →
About wreq
wreq [![Discord chat][discord badge]][discord url] [discord badge]: [discord url]: 🚀 Help me work seamlessly with open source sharing by sponsoring me on GitHub An ergonomic and modular Rust HTTP Client for high fidelity protocol matching, featuring customizable TLS, JA3/JA4, and HTTP/2 signature capabilities. Features Plain bodies, JSON, urlencoded, multipart HTTP Trailer Cookie Store Redirect Policy Original Header Rotating Proxies Tower Middleware WebSocket Upgrade HTTPS via BoringSSL HTTP/2 over TLS Parity Certificate Store (CAs & mTLS) Multiple Runtime (Tokio, Compio) Example The following example uses the…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is scrapy or wreq more popular?
scrapy has 65,180 GitHub stars and wreq has 1,092. scrapy has the larger community by that measure.
Are scrapy and wreq free?
Both are open source. scrapy is licensed under BSD-3-Clause and wreq under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between scrapy and wreq?
scrapy is written in Python and wreq in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, scrapy or wreq?
Choose scrapy if you want the larger community (65,180 stars) or its BSD-3-Clause licence terms. Choose wreq if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.