head to head · open source

Scrapegraph-ai vs playwright_mcp

Scrapegraph-ai has 32,786 GitHub stars, 3,348 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. playwright_mcp has 865 stars, 115 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Scrapegraph-ai leads on adoption by 3,690% (32,786 vs 865 stars). Scrapegraph-ai is written in Python under MIT; playwright_mcp is written in Python under MIT. Scrapegraph-ai has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, playwright_mcp 13%. playwright_mcp was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Scrapegraph-ai ★ 33K playwright_mcp ★ 865 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Scrapegraph-ai playwright_mcp
GitHub stars ★ 33K ★ 865
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-10-06 2026-11-12
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 115
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Scrapegraph-ai if

  • You weight community size — 33K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Scrapegraph-ai profile →

pick playwright_mcp if

  • You want the playwright_mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and playwright_mcp fits your workflow better

full playwright_mcp profile →

About Scrapegraph-ai

🚀 Looking for an even faster and simpler way to scrape at scale (only 5 lines of code)? Check out our enhanced version at ScrapeGraphAI.com ! 🚀 🕷️ ScrapeGraphAI: You Only Scrape Once English 中文 日本語 한국어 Русский Türkçe Deutsch Español français Português Italiano ScrapeGraphAI is a web scraping python library that uses LLM and direct graph logic to create scraping pipelines for websites and local documents (XML, HTML, JSON, Markdown, etc.). Just say which information you want to extract and the library will do it for you! 🚀 Integrations ScrapeGraphAI offers seamless integration with popular frameworks and tools…

read the full Scrapegraph-ai overview →

About playwright_mcp

Other AI browser agents get captchas. This one is invisible to anti bots. Two ways to use this browser agent 1. From your assistant, over MCP Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then install it in your assistant. Claude Code: Codex: Gemini CLI: 2. Standalone: the web UI We bring the interface, you bring an OpenRouter key. Chat on the left, the live browser on the right. Windows, in PowerShell: Linux: Then open and type the same thing. What to ask a web browsing agent Anything that needs real web automation: a browser rather than an API, and a person's judgement about what is on the page. Go to . One way, Milan to…

read the full playwright_mcp overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Related comparisons

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Scrapegraph-ai or playwright_mcp more popular?

Scrapegraph-ai has 32,786 GitHub stars and playwright_mcp has 865. Scrapegraph-ai has the larger community by that measure.

Are Scrapegraph-ai and playwright_mcp free?

Both are open source. Scrapegraph-ai is licensed under MIT and playwright_mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Scrapegraph-ai and playwright_mcp?

Scrapegraph-ai is written in Python and playwright_mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Scrapegraph-ai or playwright_mcp?

Choose Scrapegraph-ai if you want the larger community (32,786 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose playwright_mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.