head to head · open source

Sa-Token vs pwd.sh

Sa-Token has 19,056 GitHub stars, 2,914 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pwd.sh has 1,563 stars, 136 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Sa-Token leads on adoption by 1,119% (19,056 vs 1,563 stars). Sa-Token is written in Java under Apache-2.0; pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT. Sa-Token has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, pwd.sh 9%. Sa-Token was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sa-Token ★ 19K pwd.sh ★ 1.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sa-Token pwd.sh
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Shell
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 136
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sa-Token if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sa-Token profile →

pick pwd.sh if

  • You want the pwd.sh feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and pwd.sh fits your workflow better

full pwd.sh profile →

About Sa-Token

Sa Token is a free, open source, one stop Java authentication and authorization framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, that gives Java and Spring Boot developers login authentication, permission checks, distributed sessions, single sign on, OAuth2.0, gateway authentication, JWT integration, API key authorization and API parameter signing from a single dependency.

read the full Sa-Token overview →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Sa-Token vs Keycloak Sa-Token vs JumpServer Sa-Token vs Better Auth Sa-Token vs authelia Sa-Token vs Authentik Sa-Token vs casbin Sa-Token vs hydra Sa-Token vs SuperTokens Sa-Token vs Zitadel Sa-Token vs oauth2-proxy Sa-Token vs Logto Sa-Token vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is Sa-Token or pwd.sh more popular?

Sa-Token has 19,056 GitHub stars and pwd.sh has 1,563. Sa-Token has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sa-Token and pwd.sh free?

Both are open source. Sa-Token is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pwd.sh under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Sa-Token and pwd.sh?

Sa-Token is written in Java and pwd.sh in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sa-Token or pwd.sh?

Choose Sa-Token if you want the larger community (19,056 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pwd.sh if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.