head to head · open source

Sa-Token vs KeePassDX

Sa-Token has 19,107 GitHub stars, 2,913 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. KeePassDX has 7,613 stars, 425 forks, 541 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Sa-Token leads on adoption by 151% (19,107 vs 7,613 stars). Sa-Token is written in Java under Apache-2.0; KeePassDX is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. Sa-Token has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, KeePassDX 6%. KeePassDX was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Sa-Token ★ 19K KeePassDX ★ 7.6K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Sa-Token KeePassDX
GitHub stars ★ 19K ★ 7.6K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Java Kotlin
Last push 2026-10-16 2026-11-01
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 425
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Sa-Token if

  • You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Sa-Token profile →

pick KeePassDX if

  • You want the KeePassDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and KeePassDX fits your workflow better

full KeePassDX profile →

About Sa-Token

简体中文 繁體中文 English 日本語 한국어 Русский Sa Token v1.46.0 ✨ 开源、免费、一站式 java 权限认证框架,让鉴权变得简单、优雅! 在线文档: 需求提交 📝 前言: 回望 2020 年初,我为 Sa Token 提交第一行代码之际, 彼时市面上 Java 缺少的不仅是一个简洁好用的鉴权框架,更是一整套清晰、自洽的权限架构设计思想 。 因此,这几年间我将大量时间倾注在 Sa Token 的文档编写,几乎每一章节、每一句话、每一个字都经过反复修改、精细打磨,以求做到最清晰、干练、易懂的表述。 用心阅读文档,你学习到的将不止是 Sa Token 框架本身,更是绝大多数场景下权限认证设计的最佳实践 。 🛠️ Sa Token 介绍 Sa Token 是一个轻量级 Java 权限认证框架,目前拥有五大核心模块:登录认证、权限认证、单点登录、OAuth2.0、微服务鉴权。 你还在手搓以下功能? Stop,让 Sa Token 来! 要在 SpringBoot 项目中使用 Sa Token,你只需要在 pom.xml 中引入依赖: 除了支持 SpringBoot2、Sa Token 还为 SpringBoot3/4、Solon、JFinal 等常见 Web 框架提供集成包,做到真正的开箱即用。 简单示例展示: (点击展开 / 折叠) Sa Token…

read the full Sa-Token overview →

About KeePassDX

Android KeePassDX Lightweight password safe and manager for Android , KeePassDX allows editing encrypted data in a single file in KeePass format and fill in the forms in a secure way. Features Passkeys for authentication and local storage of private keys . Biometric recognition for fast unlocking (fingerprint / face unlock / …). One Time Password management (HOTP / TOTP) for two factor authentication (2FA). Autofill for easy form filling with passwords. Magikeyboard to efficiently fill in any field. Create encrypted database files . Organisation of credentials by entry and in group trees. Allows opening and…

read the full KeePassDX overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Sa-Token or KeePassDX more popular?

Sa-Token has 19,107 GitHub stars and KeePassDX has 7,613. Sa-Token has the larger community by that measure.

Are Sa-Token and KeePassDX free?

Both are open source. Sa-Token is licensed under Apache-2.0 and KeePassDX under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Sa-Token and KeePassDX?

Sa-Token is written in Java and KeePassDX in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Sa-Token or KeePassDX?

Choose Sa-Token if you want the larger community (19,107 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose KeePassDX if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.