head to head · open source
Sa-Token vs FileRise
Sa-Token has 19,066 GitHub stars, 2,911 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. FileRise has 1,020 stars, 53 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Sa-Token leads on adoption by 1,769% (19,066 vs 1,020 stars). Sa-Token is written in Java under Apache-2.0; FileRise is written in JavaScript under MIT. Sa-Token has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, FileRise 5%. FileRise was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (sso), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Sa-Token | FileRise | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 19K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Java | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-27 | 2026-10-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 53 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Sa-Token if
- You weight community size — 19K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FileRise if
- You want the FileRise feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and FileRise fits your workflow better
About Sa-Token
Sa Token is a free, open source, one stop Java authentication and authorization framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, that gives Java and Spring Boot developers login authentication, permission checks, distributed sessions, single sign on, OAuth2.0, gateway authentication, JWT integration, API key authorization and API parameter signing from a single dependency.
read the full Sa-Token overview →
About FileRise
FileRise is a self hosted web file manager and storage hub for individuals and teams who want to run their own file storage, sharing, and permissions system on infrastructure they control.
read the full FileRise overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Sa-Token or FileRise more popular?
Sa-Token has 19,066 GitHub stars and FileRise has 1,020. Sa-Token has the larger community by that measure.
Are Sa-Token and FileRise free?
Both are open source. Sa-Token is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FileRise under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Sa-Token and FileRise?
Sa-Token is written in Java and FileRise in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Sa-Token or FileRise?
Choose Sa-Token if you want the larger community (19,066 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FileRise if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.