head to head · open source

ragflow vs EvoScientist

ragflow has 91,015 GitHub stars, 10,780 forks, 1,525 open issues and last shipped today. EvoScientist has 4,928 stars, 307 forks, 51 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ragflow leads on adoption by 1,747% (91,015 vs 4,928 stars). ragflow is written in Go under Apache-2.0; EvoScientist is written in Python under Apache-2.0. ragflow has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, EvoScientist 6%. ragflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ragflow ★ 91K EvoScientist ★ 4.9K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ragflow EvoScientist
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 4.9K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 307
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ragflow if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ragflow profile →

pick EvoScientist if

  • You want the EvoScientist feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and EvoScientist fits your workflow better

full EvoScientist profile →

About ragflow

RAGFlow is an open source Retrieval Augmented Generation engine that fuses RAG with agent capabilities into a context layer for large language models, built for developers and teams that need to turn complex, unstructured documents into production AI systems.

read the full ragflow overview →

About EvoScientist

EvoScientist is an Apache 2.0 Python research platform that runs a self evolving team of AI scientists — six coordinated sub agents with persistent memory and installable skills — for researchers and research engineering teams who want autonomous exploration, code execution, and write up driven from one CLI, desktop WebUI, or chat channel.

read the full EvoScientist overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

ragflow vs Dify ragflow vs langchain ragflow vs ponytail ragflow vs generative-ai-for-beginners ragflow vs graphify ragflow vs claude-mem ragflow vs PaddleOCR ragflow vs Agent-Reach ragflow vs headroom ragflow vs Mem0 ragflow vs daily_stock_analysis ragflow vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is ragflow or EvoScientist more popular?

ragflow has 91,015 GitHub stars and EvoScientist has 4,928. ragflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are ragflow and EvoScientist free?

Both are open source. ragflow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and EvoScientist under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ragflow and EvoScientist?

ragflow is written in Go and EvoScientist in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ragflow or EvoScientist?

Choose ragflow if you want the larger community (91,015 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose EvoScientist if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.