head to head · open source

Jan vs QwenPaw

Jan has 44,566 GitHub stars, 3,040 forks, 521 open issues and last shipped yesterday. QwenPaw has 35,130 stars, 3,119 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped today. Jan leads on adoption by 27% (44,566 vs 35,130 stars). Jan is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Jan has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, QwenPaw 9%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Jan ★ 45K QwenPaw ★ 35K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Jan QwenPaw
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 35K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 3.0K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Jan if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Jan profile →

pick QwenPaw if

  • You want the QwenPaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and QwenPaw fits your workflow better

full QwenPaw profile →

About Jan

Jan is an open source desktop application that serves as a ChatGPT replacement, enabling users to run large language models (LLMs) locally on their machines or connect to cloud based providers like OpenAI and Anthropic. It is built with Tauri, TypeScript, and integrates llama.cpp for efficient local inference, targeting privacy conscious users who want full control over their AI workflows without sending data to third parties.

read the full Jan overview →

About QwenPaw

QwenPaw is a personal AI assistant harness under the Apache 2.0 licence, aimed at people who want an LLM agent running on their own machine or in their own cloud account and reachable from the chat apps they already use.

read the full QwenPaw overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Jan vs OpenClaw Jan vs Hermes Agent Jan vs Open WebUI Jan vs ComfyUI Jan vs odysseus Jan vs LobeChat Jan vs AnythingLLM Jan vs Cherry Studio Jan vs nanobot Jan vs LibreChat Jan vs chatbox Jan vs AstrBot

Frequently asked questions

Is Jan or QwenPaw more popular?

Jan has 44,566 GitHub stars and QwenPaw has 35,130. Jan has the larger community by that measure.

Are Jan and QwenPaw free?

Both are open source. Jan has no licence declared in this registry, and QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Jan and QwenPaw?

Jan is written in TypeScript and QwenPaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Jan or QwenPaw?

Choose Jan if you want the larger community (44,566 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose QwenPaw if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.