head to head · open source
quivr vs telegram-bot-sdk
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars, 3,731 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. telegram-bot-sdk has 3,298 stars, 675 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. quivr leads on adoption by 1,101% (39,624 vs 3,298 stars). quivr is written in Go under MIT; telegram-bot-sdk is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause. quivr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, telegram-bot-sdk 20%. quivr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quivr | telegram-bot-sdk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 40K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | Go | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-08-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 675 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quivr if
- You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick telegram-bot-sdk if
- You want the telegram-bot-sdk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and telegram-bot-sdk fits your workflow better
About quivr
Quivr V2 An open source engine that turns continuous content streams into search and monitoring. Quivr V2 ingests content durably, makes it searchable within seconds, enriches it in the background and lets you follow a topic over time. The core stays generic: formats, AI models and business rules belong in plugins, so you can adapt Quivr to your domain without forking the platform. Status: evaluation stage. The API is v0 and may change without notice. Do not run it in production yet. Why Quivr V2 Durable before fast. A write is acknowledged only once it is committed; outages delay processing, they never lose or…
read the full quivr overview →
About telegram-bot-sdk
[ ][link repo] Telegram Bot API PHP SDK ========================== Telegram Bot PHP SDK lets you develop Telegram Bots in PHP easily! Supports Laravel out of the box. [Telegram Bot API][link telegram bot api] is an HTTP based interface created for developers keen on building bots for Telegram. To learn more about the Telegram Bot API, please consult the [Introduction to Bots][link telegram bot api] and Bot FAQ on official Telegram site. To get started writing your bots using this SDK, Please refer the [documentation][link docs]. Supported Versions Only the latest released version of the SDK is supported. To…
read the full telegram-bot-sdk overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quivr or telegram-bot-sdk more popular?
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars and telegram-bot-sdk has 3,298. quivr has the larger community by that measure.
Are quivr and telegram-bot-sdk free?
Both are open source. quivr is licensed under MIT and telegram-bot-sdk under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quivr and telegram-bot-sdk?
quivr is written in Go and telegram-bot-sdk in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quivr or telegram-bot-sdk?
Choose quivr if you want the larger community (39,624 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose telegram-bot-sdk if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.