head to head · open source
quivr vs python-telegram-bot
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars, 3,731 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. python-telegram-bot has 29,545 stars, 6,180 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. quivr leads on adoption by 34% (39,624 vs 29,545 stars). quivr is written in Go under MIT; python-telegram-bot is written in Python under GPL-3.0. quivr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, python-telegram-bot 21%. quivr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (chatbot, framework), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quivr | python-telegram-bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 40K | ★ 30K |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 6.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quivr if
- You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick python-telegram-bot if
- You want the python-telegram-bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and python-telegram-bot fits your workflow better
About quivr
Quivr V2 An open source engine that turns continuous content streams into search and monitoring. Quivr V2 ingests content durably, makes it searchable within seconds, enriches it in the background and lets you follow a topic over time. The core stays generic: formats, AI models and business rules belong in plugins, so you can adapt Quivr to your domain without forking the platform. Status: evaluation stage. The API is v0 and may change without notice. Do not run it in production yet. Why Quivr V2 Durable before fast. A write is acknowledged only once it is committed; outages delay processing, they never lose or…
read the full quivr overview →
About python-telegram-bot
.. image:: :align: center :target: :alt: python telegram bot Logo .. image:: :target: :alt: PyPi Package Version .. image:: :target: :alt: Supported Python versions .. image:: :target: :alt: Supported Bot API version .. image:: :target: :alt: PyPi Package Monthly Download .. image:: :target: :alt: Documentation Status .. image:: :target: :alt: LGPLv3 License .. image:: :target: :alt: Github Actions workflow .. image:: :target: :alt: Code coverage .. image:: :target: :alt: Median time to resolve an issue .. image:: :target: :alt: Code quality: Codacy .. image:: :target: :alt: Code Style: Black .. image:: :target…
read the full python-telegram-bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quivr or python-telegram-bot more popular?
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars and python-telegram-bot has 29,545. quivr has the larger community by that measure.
Are quivr and python-telegram-bot free?
Both are open source. quivr is licensed under MIT and python-telegram-bot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quivr and python-telegram-bot?
quivr is written in Go and python-telegram-bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quivr or python-telegram-bot?
Choose quivr if you want the larger community (39,624 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose python-telegram-bot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.