head to head · open source
quivr vs openilink-hub
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars, 3,731 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openilink-hub has 1,605 stars, 150 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. quivr leads on adoption by 2,369% (39,624 vs 1,605 stars). quivr is written in Go under MIT; openilink-hub is written in Go under MIT. quivr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, openilink-hub 9%. quivr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quivr | openilink-hub | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 40K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 150 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quivr if
- You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openilink-hub if
- You want the openilink-hub feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and openilink-hub fits your workflow better
About quivr
Quivr V2 An open source engine that turns continuous content streams into search and monitoring. Quivr V2 ingests content durably, makes it searchable within seconds, enriches it in the background and lets you follow a topic over time. The core stays generic: formats, AI models and business rules belong in plugins, so you can adapt Quivr to your domain without forking the platform. Status: evaluation stage. The API is v0 and may change without notice. Do not run it in production yet. Why Quivr V2 Durable before fast. A write is acknowledged only once it is committed; outages delay processing, they never lose or…
read the full quivr overview →
About openilink-hub
免责声明 ：本项目基于公开的 iLink 协议进行独立开发，仅供学习交流与技术研究使用。项目与 iLink 协议的官方团队无任何关联或授权关系。若相关权利方认为本项目存在侵权，请通过 Issue 联系我们，我们将在确认后第一时间予以下架处理。 Disclaimer: This project is independently developed based on the publicly available iLink protocol for learning and research purposes only. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the official iLink team. If any rights holder believes this project infringes upon their rights, please contact us via an Issue and we will take it down promptly upon confirmation. 微信 ClawBot iLink 协议的开源消息管理平台 + App 应用市场 Open source message management platform + App Marketplace for WeChat ClawBot (iLink protocol)…
read the full openilink-hub overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quivr or openilink-hub more popular?
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars and openilink-hub has 1,605. quivr has the larger community by that measure.
Are quivr and openilink-hub free?
Both are open source. quivr is licensed under MIT and openilink-hub under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quivr and openilink-hub?
quivr is written in Go and openilink-hub in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quivr or openilink-hub?
Choose quivr if you want the larger community (39,624 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openilink-hub if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.