head to head · open source
quivr vs node-telegram-bot-api
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars, 3,731 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. node-telegram-bot-api has 9,216 stars, 1,646 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quivr leads on adoption by 330% (39,624 vs 9,216 stars). quivr is written in Go under MIT; node-telegram-bot-api is written in TypeScript under MIT. quivr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, node-telegram-bot-api 18%. node-telegram-bot-api was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api, chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quivr | node-telegram-bot-api | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 40K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quivr if
- You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick node-telegram-bot-api if
- You want the node-telegram-bot-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and node-telegram-bot-api fits your workflow better
About quivr
Quivr V2 An open source engine that turns continuous content streams into search and monitoring. Quivr V2 ingests content durably, makes it searchable within seconds, enriches it in the background and lets you follow a topic over time. The core stays generic: formats, AI models and business rules belong in plugins, so you can adapt Quivr to your domain without forking the platform. Status: evaluation stage. The API is v0 and may change without notice. Do not run it in production yet. Why Quivr V2 Durable before fast. A write is acknowledged only once it is committed; outages delay processing, they never lose or…
read the full quivr overview →
About node-telegram-bot-api
✨ A Modern Telegram Bot API Library ✨ v2 is a from scratch redesign, no v1 compatibility. Coming from v1? See the v1 v2 migration guide in the changelog. 📦 Install Runs on Bun, modern Node.js, Deno, Cloudflare Workers and Vercel Functions λ 🚀 Usage 📡 Calling the API directly Api mirrors the wire API 1:1 one method per Bot API method, each taking a single params object. 🧩 Middleware koa style middleware around every update; on / command / hears are filters in the same chain. Wrap downstream work with await next() . ⌨️ Keyboards & formatting Structured fields are plain typed objects pass a literal or use a…
read the full node-telegram-bot-api overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quivr or node-telegram-bot-api more popular?
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars and node-telegram-bot-api has 9,216. quivr has the larger community by that measure.
Are quivr and node-telegram-bot-api free?
Both are open source. quivr is licensed under MIT and node-telegram-bot-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quivr and node-telegram-bot-api?
quivr is written in Go and node-telegram-bot-api in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quivr or node-telegram-bot-api?
Choose quivr if you want the larger community (39,624 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose node-telegram-bot-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.