head to head · open source

pwd.sh vs pykeepass

pwd.sh has 1,564 GitHub stars, 135 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. pykeepass has 511 stars, 103 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. pwd.sh leads on adoption by 206% (1,564 vs 511 stars). pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT; pykeepass is written in Python under GPL-3.0. pwd.sh has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pykeepass 20%. pwd.sh was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (password-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pwd.sh ★ 1.6K pykeepass ★ 511 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pwd.sh pykeepass
GitHub stars ★ 1.6K ★ 511
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Shell Python
Last push 2026-08-24 2026-08-09
Forks ⑂ 135 ⑂ 103
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pwd.sh if

  • You weight community size — 1.6K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pwd.sh profile →

pick pykeepass if

  • You want the pykeepass feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and pykeepass fits your workflow better

full pykeepass profile →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

About pykeepass

pykeepass is a Python library for reading, writing and automating KeePass .kdbx password databases (KDBX3 and KDBX4) for developers and self hosters who want programmatic access to their credentials.

read the full pykeepass overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Tailscale ★ 37K Keycloak ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

pwd.sh vs Keycloak pwd.sh vs JumpServer pwd.sh vs Better Auth pwd.sh vs authelia pwd.sh vs Authentik pwd.sh vs casbin pwd.sh vs Sa-Token pwd.sh vs hydra pwd.sh vs SuperTokens pwd.sh vs Zitadel pwd.sh vs oauth2-proxy pwd.sh vs Logto

Frequently asked questions

Is pwd.sh or pykeepass more popular?

pwd.sh has 1,564 GitHub stars and pykeepass has 511. pwd.sh has the larger community by that measure.

Are pwd.sh and pykeepass free?

Both are open source. pwd.sh is licensed under MIT and pykeepass under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pwd.sh and pykeepass?

pwd.sh is written in Shell and pykeepass in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pwd.sh or pykeepass?

Choose pwd.sh if you want the larger community (1,564 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pykeepass if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.