head to head · open source

pwd.sh vs Purse

pwd.sh has 1,564 GitHub stars, 135 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Purse has 615 stars, 43 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. pwd.sh leads on adoption by 154% (1,564 vs 615 stars). pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT; Purse is written in Shell under MIT. pwd.sh has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Purse 7%. pwd.sh was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 12 topic tags (bash, bash-script, cryptography, encryption), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pwd.sh ★ 1.6K Purse ★ 615 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pwd.sh Purse
GitHub stars ★ 1.6K ★ 615
License MIT MIT
Written in Shell Shell
Last push 2026-08-24 2026-07-26
Forks ⑂ 135 ⑂ 43
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pwd.sh if

  • You weight community size — 1.6K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pwd.sh profile →

pick Purse if

  • You want the Purse feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and Purse fits your workflow better

full Purse profile →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

About Purse

Purse is a Bash script that stores passwords and secrets in GnuPG encrypted files, unlocking them with a YubiKey instead of a passphrase, for people who manage their own credentials on the command line.

read the full Purse overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

pwd.sh vs Keycloak pwd.sh vs JumpServer pwd.sh vs Better Auth pwd.sh vs authelia pwd.sh vs Authentik pwd.sh vs casbin pwd.sh vs Sa-Token pwd.sh vs hydra pwd.sh vs SuperTokens pwd.sh vs Zitadel pwd.sh vs oauth2-proxy pwd.sh vs Logto

Frequently asked questions

Is pwd.sh or Purse more popular?

pwd.sh has 1,564 GitHub stars and Purse has 615. pwd.sh has the larger community by that measure.

Are pwd.sh and Purse free?

Both are open source. pwd.sh is licensed under MIT and Purse under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pwd.sh and Purse?

pwd.sh is written in Shell and Purse in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pwd.sh or Purse?

Choose pwd.sh if you want the larger community (1,564 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Purse if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.