head to head · open source

pwd.sh vs pass-import

pwd.sh has 1,563 GitHub stars, 135 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. pass-import has 917 stars, 98 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. pwd.sh leads on adoption by 70% (1,563 vs 917 stars). pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT; pass-import is written in Python under GPL-3.0. pwd.sh has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pass-import 11%. pwd.sh was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (password, password-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pwd.sh ★ 1.6K pass-import ★ 917 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pwd.sh pass-import
GitHub stars ★ 1.6K ★ 917
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Shell Python
Last push 2026-08-24 2026-06-07
Forks ⑂ 135 ⑂ 98
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pwd.sh if

  • You weight community size — 1.6K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pwd.sh profile →

pick pass-import if

  • You want the pass-import feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and pass-import fits your workflow better

full pass-import profile →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

About pass-import

pass import is a GPL 3.0 Python extension for pass, the file based Unix password manager, that imports existing password databases from 63 different password managers into a pass password store and can also export credentials to other managers through its companion pimport script.

read the full pass-import overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

pwd.sh vs Keycloak pwd.sh vs JumpServer pwd.sh vs Better Auth pwd.sh vs authelia pwd.sh vs Authentik pwd.sh vs casbin pwd.sh vs Sa-Token pwd.sh vs hydra pwd.sh vs SuperTokens pwd.sh vs Zitadel pwd.sh vs oauth2-proxy pwd.sh vs Logto

Frequently asked questions

Is pwd.sh or pass-import more popular?

pwd.sh has 1,563 GitHub stars and pass-import has 917. pwd.sh has the larger community by that measure.

Are pwd.sh and pass-import free?

Both are open source. pwd.sh is licensed under MIT and pass-import under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pwd.sh and pass-import?

pwd.sh is written in Shell and pass-import in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pwd.sh or pass-import?

Choose pwd.sh if you want the larger community (1,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pass-import if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.