head to head · open source

pwd.sh vs Monica

pwd.sh has 1,563 GitHub stars, 136 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Monica has 1,028 stars, 62 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. pwd.sh leads on adoption by 52% (1,563 vs 1,028 stars). pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT; Monica is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. pwd.sh has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Monica 6%. Monica was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (password-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pwd.sh ★ 1.6K Monica ★ 1.0K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pwd.sh Monica
GitHub stars ★ 1.6K ★ 1.0K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Shell Kotlin
Last push 2026-08-24 2026-09-21
Forks ⑂ 136 ⑂ 62
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pwd.sh if

  • You weight community size — 1.6K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pwd.sh profile →

pick Monica if

  • You want the Monica feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Monica fits your workflow better

full Monica profile →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

About Monica

Monica is a local first password manager and 2FA generator for Android, written in Kotlin and released under GPL 3.0, that aggregates Bitwarden and KeePass vaults into a single encrypted store for people who want their credentials to stay on their own devices rather than in a third party cloud.

read the full Monica overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

pwd.sh vs Keycloak pwd.sh vs JumpServer pwd.sh vs Better Auth pwd.sh vs authelia pwd.sh vs Authentik pwd.sh vs casbin pwd.sh vs Sa-Token pwd.sh vs hydra pwd.sh vs SuperTokens pwd.sh vs Zitadel pwd.sh vs oauth2-proxy pwd.sh vs Logto

Frequently asked questions

Is pwd.sh or Monica more popular?

pwd.sh has 1,563 GitHub stars and Monica has 1,028. pwd.sh has the larger community by that measure.

Are pwd.sh and Monica free?

Both are open source. pwd.sh is licensed under MIT and Monica under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pwd.sh and Monica?

pwd.sh is written in Shell and Monica in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pwd.sh or Monica?

Choose pwd.sh if you want the larger community (1,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Monica if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.