head to head · open source
proxy_pool vs xxl-crawler
proxy_pool has 23,780 GitHub stars, 5,417 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. xxl-crawler has 757 stars, 316 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 3,041% (23,780 vs 757 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; xxl-crawler is written in Java under Apache-2.0. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, xxl-crawler 42%. xxl-crawler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (crawler, spider), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| proxy_pool | xxl-crawler | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 757 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-06-15 | 2026-08-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 316 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick proxy_pool if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick xxl-crawler if
- You want the xxl-crawler feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and xxl-crawler fits your workflow better
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
About xxl-crawler
XXL CRAWLER XXL CRAWLER, a lightweight web crawler framework. Home Page Introduction XXL CRAWLER is a lightweight web crawler framework. A line of code to develop a multi threaded crawler, fully annotated way to collect page data to Java objects, with "multi threaded, fully annotated, JS rendering, proxy, distributed extension" and other features; XXL CRAWLER 是一个轻量级Java爬虫框架。一行代码开发一个多线程爬虫，全注解方式采集页面数据至Java对象，拥有"多线程、全注解、JS渲染、代理、分布式扩展"等特性； Documentation 中文文档 Features 1、简洁：API直观简洁，可快速上手； 2、轻量级：底层实现仅强依赖jsoup，简洁高效； 3、模块化：模块化的结构设计，可轻松扩展； 4、全注解：支持通过注解提取页面数据，高效映射页面数据到PageVO对象，底层自动完成PageVO对象的数据抽取和封装返回；单个页面支持抽取一个或多个PageVO；…
read the full xxl-crawler overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is proxy_pool or xxl-crawler more popular?
proxy_pool has 23,780 GitHub stars and xxl-crawler has 757. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.
Are proxy_pool and xxl-crawler free?
Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and xxl-crawler under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between proxy_pool and xxl-crawler?
proxy_pool is written in Python and xxl-crawler in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, proxy_pool or xxl-crawler?
Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,780 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose xxl-crawler if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.