head to head · open source

proxy_pool vs toapi

proxy_pool has 23,717 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. toapi has 3,555 stars, 241 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 567% (23,717 vs 3,555 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; toapi is written in Python under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, toapi 7%. toapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (crawler, spider), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

proxy_pool ★ 24K toapi ★ 3.6K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

proxy_pool toapi
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-06-15 2026-08-27
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 241
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick proxy_pool if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full proxy_pool profile →

pick toapi if

  • You want the toapi feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and toapi fits your workflow better

full toapi profile →

About proxy_pool

proxy pool is a self hosted Python proxy IP pool for web spiders that continuously collects, checks, and serves rotating HTTP proxies from public free proxy sources through a Redis backed pool.

read the full proxy_pool overview →

About toapi

toapi is a Python library that turns any web page into a JSON API by declaring the fields to extract with CSS selectors, aimed at developers who need structured data from sites that never published an API.

read the full toapi overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

proxy_pool vs Browser Use proxy_pool vs Crawl4AI proxy_pool vs Scrapling proxy_pool vs scrapy proxy_pool vs EasySpider proxy_pool vs Lightpanda proxy_pool vs changedetection.io proxy_pool vs lux proxy_pool vs CloakBrowser proxy_pool vs Scrapegraph-ai proxy_pool vs crawlee proxy_pool vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is proxy_pool or toapi more popular?

proxy_pool has 23,717 GitHub stars and toapi has 3,555. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.

Are proxy_pool and toapi free?

Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and toapi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between proxy_pool and toapi?

proxy_pool is written in Python and toapi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, proxy_pool or toapi?

Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,717 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose toapi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.