head to head · open source
proxy_pool vs pydoll
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. pydoll has 7,132 stars, 413 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 233% (23,778 vs 7,132 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; pydoll is written in HTML under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, pydoll 6%. pydoll was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| proxy_pool | pydoll | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 7.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-06-15 | 2026-10-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 413 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick proxy_pool if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pydoll if
- You want the pydoll feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and pydoll fits your workflow better
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
About pydoll
The stealth first browser automation library for Python. No WebDriver, no navigator.webdriver flag, humanized clicks and typing. = 3.10" Documentation · Getting Started · Features · Support You have probably watched a scraper work on your machine, then hit a wall of captchas and Cloudflare challenges the moment it ran for real. That wall is what Pydoll is built around. It drives Chrome directly over the DevTools Protocol, so there is no WebDriver binary and no navigator.webdriver flag to give you away, and it clicks, types, and scrolls like a real person. That is often enough to get past the…
read the full pydoll overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is proxy_pool or pydoll more popular?
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars and pydoll has 7,132. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.
Are proxy_pool and pydoll free?
Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and pydoll under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between proxy_pool and pydoll?
proxy_pool is written in Python and pydoll in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, proxy_pool or pydoll?
Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,778 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pydoll if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.