head to head · open source
proxy_pool vs firecrawl-mcp-server
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,751 stars, 926 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped yesterday. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 207% (23,778 vs 7,751 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; firecrawl-mcp-server is written in JavaScript under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, firecrawl-mcp-server 12%. firecrawl-mcp-server was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| proxy_pool | firecrawl-mcp-server | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 7.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-06-15 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 926 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick proxy_pool if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick firecrawl-mcp-server if
- You want the firecrawl-mcp-server feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and firecrawl-mcp-server fits your workflow better
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
About firecrawl-mcp-server
Firecrawl MCP Server A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that brings Firecrawl to MCP compatible AI agents — search, scrape, and interact with the live web for clean, agent ready context. Big thanks to @vrknetha, @knacklabs for the initial implementation! Features Search the web and get full page content Search an index built for coding agents: GitHub issues, merged pull requests, READMEs, and docs Scrape any URL into clean, structured data Interact with pages — click, navigate, and operate Deep research with autonomous agent Automatic retries and rate limiting Cloud and self hosted support SSE support Play…
read the full firecrawl-mcp-server overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is proxy_pool or firecrawl-mcp-server more popular?
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars and firecrawl-mcp-server has 7,751. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.
Are proxy_pool and firecrawl-mcp-server free?
Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and firecrawl-mcp-server under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between proxy_pool and firecrawl-mcp-server?
proxy_pool is written in Python and firecrawl-mcp-server in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, proxy_pool or firecrawl-mcp-server?
Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,778 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose firecrawl-mcp-server if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.