head to head · open source

proxy_pool vs finvizfinance

proxy_pool has 23,717 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. finvizfinance has 1,706 stars, 280 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 1,290% (23,717 vs 1,706 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; finvizfinance is written in Python under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, finvizfinance 16%. finvizfinance was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

proxy_pool ★ 24K finvizfinance ★ 1.7K category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

proxy_pool finvizfinance
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-06-15 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 280
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick proxy_pool if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full proxy_pool profile →

pick finvizfinance if

  • You want the finvizfinance feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and finvizfinance fits your workflow better

full finvizfinance profile →

About proxy_pool

proxy pool is a self hosted Python proxy IP pool for web spiders that continuously collects, checks, and serves rotating HTTP proxies from public free proxy sources through a Redis backed pool.

read the full proxy_pool overview →

About finvizfinance

finvizfinance is an MIT licensed Python library that scrapes the FinViz website to deliver stock, forex, and crypto data as pandas dataframes, made for analysts, quants, and developers who want programmatic access to FinViz screens, fundamentals, and news instead of reading the site by hand.

read the full finvizfinance overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot clickhouse vs duckdb crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

proxy_pool vs Browser Use proxy_pool vs Crawl4AI proxy_pool vs Scrapling proxy_pool vs scrapy proxy_pool vs EasySpider proxy_pool vs Lightpanda proxy_pool vs changedetection.io proxy_pool vs lux proxy_pool vs CloakBrowser proxy_pool vs Scrapegraph-ai proxy_pool vs crawlee proxy_pool vs colly

Frequently asked questions

Is proxy_pool or finvizfinance more popular?

proxy_pool has 23,717 GitHub stars and finvizfinance has 1,706. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.

Are proxy_pool and finvizfinance free?

Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and finvizfinance under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between proxy_pool and finvizfinance?

proxy_pool is written in Python and finvizfinance in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, proxy_pool or finvizfinance?

Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,717 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose finvizfinance if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.