head to head · open source
proxy_pool vs ferret
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. ferret has 6,020 stars, 325 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped yesterday. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 295% (23,778 vs 6,020 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; ferret is written in Go under Apache-2.0. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, ferret 5%. ferret was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| proxy_pool | ferret | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 6.0K |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-06-15 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 325 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick proxy_pool if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ferret if
- You want the ferret feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and ferret fits your workflow better
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
About ferret
Ferret Try it! Docs CLI Test runner Web worker Explore Ferret v2 Ferret v2 is currently in alpha. You can try the new syntax in the playground and read more about the design behind the new runtime and language capabilities: Try Ferret v2 in the Playground On the Road to Ferret v2 Inside Ferret v2: The New Execution Model Inside Ferret v2: New Language Capabilities Notice: This branch contains the upcoming Ferret v2 . For the stable v1 release, please visit Ferret v1. What is it? Ferret is a declarative first, expression oriented embedded language and runtime for data automation. FQL combines querying…
read the full ferret overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is proxy_pool or ferret more popular?
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars and ferret has 6,020. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.
Are proxy_pool and ferret free?
Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and ferret under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between proxy_pool and ferret?
proxy_pool is written in Python and ferret in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, proxy_pool or ferret?
Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,778 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ferret if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.