head to head · open source
proxy_pool vs curl_cffi
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. curl_cffi has 6,812 stars, 571 forks, 72 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 249% (23,778 vs 6,812 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; curl_cffi is written in Python under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, curl_cffi 8%. curl_cffi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (http), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| proxy_pool | curl_cffi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 6.8K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-06-15 | 2026-10-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 571 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick proxy_pool if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick curl_cffi if
- You want the curl_cffi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and curl_cffi fits your workflow better
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
About curl_cffi
curl cffi Documentation Python binding for curl impersonate fork via cffi. For commercial support, visit impersonate.pro. curl cffi is the most popular Python binding for curl . Unlike other pure python http clients like httpx or requests , curl cffi can impersonate browsers' TLS/JA3 and HTTP/2 fingerprints. If you are blocked by some website for no obvious reason, you can give curl cffi a try. For JavaScript bindings, see impers, for solving JavaScript challenges, see brimp. Python 3.10 is the minimum supported version since v0.14. Recent highlights 🧭 Our new toy, brimp, a lightweight browser, works like curl…
read the full curl_cffi overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is proxy_pool or curl_cffi more popular?
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars and curl_cffi has 6,812. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.
Are proxy_pool and curl_cffi free?
Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and curl_cffi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between proxy_pool and curl_cffi?
proxy_pool is written in Python and curl_cffi in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, proxy_pool or curl_cffi?
Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,778 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose curl_cffi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.