head to head · open source

ponytail vs Letta

ponytail has 141,230 GitHub stars, 7,572 forks, 270 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Letta has 3,366 stars, 411 forks, 347 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ponytail leads on adoption by 4,096% (141,230 vs 3,366 stars). ponytail is written in JavaScript under MIT; Letta is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. ponytail has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Letta 12%. Letta was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (claude), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ponytail ★ 141K Letta ★ 3.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ponytail Letta
GitHub stars ★ 141K ★ 3.4K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.6K ⑂ 411
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ponytail if

  • You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ponytail profile →

pick Letta if

  • You want the Letta feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Letta fits your workflow better

full Letta profile →

About ponytail

Ponytail is an open source agent skill for JavaScript and LLM based coding tools that makes an AI agent write the minimum working code for a task, and it is built for developers and teams running agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor against real repositories.

read the full ponytail overview →

About Letta

Letta Code is an open source TypeScript harness under Apache 2.0 for stateful AI agents. It lives in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Development Platforms ecosystem. It gives agents memory, identity, and a sense of experience over time. It targets agents that behave more like people than tools.

read the full Letta overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail ponytail vs graphify dify vs langchain dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

ponytail vs Dify ponytail vs langchain ponytail vs generative-ai-for-beginners ponytail vs graphify ponytail vs claude-mem ponytail vs ragflow ponytail vs PaddleOCR ponytail vs Agent-Reach ponytail vs headroom ponytail vs Mem0 ponytail vs daily_stock_analysis ponytail vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is ponytail or Letta more popular?

ponytail has 141,230 GitHub stars and Letta has 3,366. ponytail has the larger community by that measure.

Are ponytail and Letta free?

Both are open source. ponytail is licensed under MIT and Letta under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ponytail and Letta?

ponytail is written in JavaScript and Letta in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ponytail or Letta?

Choose ponytail if you want the larger community (141,230 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Letta if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.