head to head · open source

ponytail vs html-video

ponytail has 141,465 GitHub stars, 7,581 forks, 270 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. html-video has 4,587 stars, 564 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. ponytail leads on adoption by 2,984% (141,465 vs 4,587 stars). ponytail is written in JavaScript under MIT; html-video is written in HTML under Apache-2.0. ponytail has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, html-video 12%. ponytail was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ponytail ★ 141K html-video ★ 4.6K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

ponytail html-video
GitHub stars ★ 141K ★ 4.6K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-06-21
Forks ⑂ 7.6K ⑂ 564
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ponytail if

  • You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ponytail profile →

pick html-video if

  • You want the html-video feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and html-video fits your workflow better

full html-video profile →

About ponytail

Ponytail is an open source agent skill for JavaScript and LLM based coding tools that makes an AI agent write the minimum working code for a task, and it is built for developers and teams running agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor against real repositories.

read the full ponytail overview →

About html-video

html video is an Apache 2.0 meta layer from the Open Design team that turns HTML, CSS and data into real MP4 files on a local laptop, built for coding agents and the developers who drive them.

read the full html-video overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

dify vs ponytail openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

ponytail vs Dify ponytail vs langchain ponytail vs generative-ai-for-beginners ponytail vs graphify ponytail vs claude-mem ponytail vs ragflow ponytail vs PaddleOCR ponytail vs Agent-Reach ponytail vs headroom ponytail vs Mem0 ponytail vs daily_stock_analysis ponytail vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is ponytail or html-video more popular?

ponytail has 141,465 GitHub stars and html-video has 4,587. ponytail has the larger community by that measure.

Are ponytail and html-video free?

Both are open source. ponytail is licensed under MIT and html-video under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ponytail and html-video?

ponytail is written in JavaScript and html-video in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ponytail or html-video?

Choose ponytail if you want the larger community (141,465 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose html-video if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.