head to head · open source

ponytail vs cua

ponytail has 141,230 GitHub stars, 7,572 forks, 270 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. cua has 22,799 stars, 1,587 forks, 926 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ponytail leads on adoption by 519% (141,230 vs 22,799 stars). ponytail is written in JavaScript under MIT; cua is written in HTML under MIT. ponytail has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, cua 7%. cua was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ponytail ★ 141K cua ★ 23K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ponytail cua
GitHub stars ★ 141K ★ 23K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript HTML
Last push 2026-09-14 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 7.6K ⑂ 1.6K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ponytail if

  • You weight community size — 141K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ponytail profile →

pick cua if

  • You want the cua feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and cua fits your workflow better

full cua profile →

About ponytail

Ponytail is an open source agent skill for JavaScript and LLM based coding tools that makes an AI agent write the minimum working code for a task, and it is built for developers and teams running agents such as Claude Code, Codex, or Cursor against real repositories.

read the full ponytail overview →

About cua

Cua is an MIT licensed, open source platform that gives AI agents computers to use, packaging desktop automation drivers, isolated cloud desktops, local macOS virtual machines, and benchmarks for training, evaluation, and data generation — it is aimed at developers and teams building computer use agents who bring their own agent and model.

read the full cua overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail ponytail vs graphify dify vs langchain dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

ponytail vs Dify ponytail vs langchain ponytail vs generative-ai-for-beginners ponytail vs graphify ponytail vs claude-mem ponytail vs ragflow ponytail vs PaddleOCR ponytail vs Agent-Reach ponytail vs headroom ponytail vs Mem0 ponytail vs daily_stock_analysis ponytail vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is ponytail or cua more popular?

ponytail has 141,230 GitHub stars and cua has 22,799. ponytail has the larger community by that measure.

Are ponytail and cua free?

Both are open source. ponytail is licensed under MIT and cua under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ponytail and cua?

ponytail is written in JavaScript and cua in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ponytail or cua?

Choose ponytail if you want the larger community (141,230 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cua if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.