head to head · open source
pixijs vs react-chartjs-2
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars, 5,135 forks, 344 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. react-chartjs-2 has 6,937 stars, 2,424 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. pixijs leads on adoption by 601% (48,618 vs 6,937 stars). pixijs is written in TypeScript under MIT; react-chartjs-2 is written in TypeScript under MIT. pixijs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, react-chartjs-2 35%. pixijs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pixijs | react-chartjs-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49K | ★ 6.9K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 2.4K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pixijs if
- You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick react-chartjs-2 if
- You want the react-chartjs-2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and react-chartjs-2 fits your workflow better
About pixijs
Guides Tutorials Examples API Docs Discord Bluesky 𝕏 PixiJS ⚡️ Next Generation, Fastest HTML5 Creation Engine for the Web 🚀 WebGL & WebGPU Renderers ⚡️ Unmatched Performance & Speed 🎨 Easy to use, yet powerful API 📦 Asset Loader ✋ Full Mouse & Multi touch Support ✍️ Flexible Text Rendering 📐 Versatile Primitive and SVG Drawing 🖼️ Dynamic Textures 🎭 Masking 🪄 Powerful Filters 🌈 Advanced Blend Modes PixiJS is the fastest, most lightweight 2D library available for the web, working across all devices and allowing you to create rich, interactive graphics and cross platform applications using WebGL and…
read the full pixijs overview →
About react-chartjs-2
react chartjs 2 React components for Chart.js , the most popular charting library. Supports Chart.js v4 and v3. [![NPM version][npm]][npm url] [![Downloads][downloads]][downloads url] [![Build status][build]][build url] [![Coverage status][coverage]][coverage url] [![Bundle size][size]][size url] [npm]: [npm url]: [downloads]: [downloads url]: [build]: [build url]: [coverage]: [coverage url]: [size]: [size url]: Quickstart • Docs • Stack Overflow Quickstart Install this library with peer dependencies: We recommend using chart.js@^4.0.0 . Then, import and use individual components: Docs Migration to v4 Working…
read the full react-chartjs-2 overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pixijs or react-chartjs-2 more popular?
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars and react-chartjs-2 has 6,937. pixijs has the larger community by that measure.
Are pixijs and react-chartjs-2 free?
Both are open source. pixijs is licensed under MIT and react-chartjs-2 under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pixijs and react-chartjs-2?
pixijs is written in TypeScript and react-chartjs-2 in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pixijs or react-chartjs-2?
Choose pixijs if you want the larger community (48,618 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose react-chartjs-2 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.