head to head · open source
pixijs vs F2
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars, 5,135 forks, 344 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. F2 has 7,995 stars, 637 forks, 303 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. pixijs leads on adoption by 508% (48,618 vs 7,995 stars). pixijs is written in TypeScript under MIT; F2 is written in JavaScript under MIT. pixijs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, F2 8%. pixijs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (data-visualization), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pixijs | F2 | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49K | ★ 8.0K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-05-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 637 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pixijs if
- You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick F2 if
- You want the F2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and F2 fits your workflow better
About pixijs
Guides Tutorials Examples API Docs Discord Bluesky 𝕏 PixiJS ⚡️ Next Generation, Fastest HTML5 Creation Engine for the Web 🚀 WebGL & WebGPU Renderers ⚡️ Unmatched Performance & Speed 🎨 Easy to use, yet powerful API 📦 Asset Loader ✋ Full Mouse & Multi touch Support ✍️ Flexible Text Rendering 📐 Versatile Primitive and SVG Drawing 🖼️ Dynamic Textures 🎭 Masking 🪄 Powerful Filters 🌈 Advanced Blend Modes PixiJS is the fastest, most lightweight 2D library available for the web, working across all devices and allowing you to create rich, interactive graphics and cross platform applications using WebGL and…
read the full pixijs overview →
About F2
F2，一个专注于移动，开箱即用的可视化解决方案，完美支持 H5 环境同时兼容多种环境（node, 小程序，weex）。完备的图形语法理论，满足你的各种可视化需求。专业的移动设计指引为你带来最佳的移动端图表体验。英文 README 在此衷心感谢《The Grammar of Graphics》的作者 Leland Wilkinson，为 F2 的图形语法提供了理论基础！ 安装 特性 专注移动，体验优雅 轻量化呈现，自然反馈 ：在设计上我们以人为本，追求自然简单易懂，有吸引力的表达效果，让用户在碎片化的时间里更快更高效得获取图表信息。同时在可视化的操作我们追求内容和操作有机融合，符合人的自然行为反应，让交互操作更自然。 轻巧流畅 ：F2 一直致力于追求极致的性能，针对移动设备做了大量的优化，在支持丰富（50+）图表的基础上同时保持代码量的小巧（不带交互版本 gzip 压缩后 44k，带所有交互版本 56k），同时提供模块化的设计以支持动态加载，提供更优的大小。 多端异构 ：在完美支持 H5 环境的同时，同时兼容 Node.js，支付宝小程序、微信小程序、React Native以及 Weex 端的渲染，一份代码，多设备多环境渲染。 图表丰富，组件完备 与传统的图表库不同，抛弃了特图特做的封装思路，基于强大的图形语法理论，以数据驱动，通过图形语法的组合灵活构建各类图表，目前可绘制 50+…
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pixijs or F2 more popular?
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars and F2 has 7,995. pixijs has the larger community by that measure.
Are pixijs and F2 free?
Both are open source. pixijs is licensed under MIT and F2 under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pixijs and F2?
pixijs is written in TypeScript and F2 in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pixijs or F2?
Choose pixijs if you want the larger community (48,618 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose F2 if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.