head to head · open source
pixijs vs django-slick-reporting
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars, 5,135 forks, 344 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. django-slick-reporting has 604 stars, 50 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. pixijs leads on adoption by 7,949% (48,618 vs 604 stars). pixijs is written in TypeScript under MIT; django-slick-reporting is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. pixijs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, django-slick-reporting 8%. pixijs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pixijs | django-slick-reporting | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 49K | ★ 604 |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 50 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pixijs if
- You weight community size — 49K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick django-slick-reporting if
- You want the django-slick-reporting feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and django-slick-reporting fits your workflow better
About pixijs
Guides Tutorials Examples API Docs Discord Bluesky 𝕏 PixiJS ⚡️ Next Generation, Fastest HTML5 Creation Engine for the Web 🚀 WebGL & WebGPU Renderers ⚡️ Unmatched Performance & Speed 🎨 Easy to use, yet powerful API 📦 Asset Loader ✋ Full Mouse & Multi touch Support ✍️ Flexible Text Rendering 📐 Versatile Primitive and SVG Drawing 🖼️ Dynamic Textures 🎭 Masking 🪄 Powerful Filters 🌈 Advanced Blend Modes PixiJS is the fastest, most lightweight 2D library available for the web, working across all devices and allowing you to create rich, interactive graphics and cross platform applications using WebGL and…
read the full pixijs overview →
About django-slick-reporting
Django Slick Reporting The one stop reporting engine for Django — analytics, charts & dashboards in a few lines of code. Grouped totals, time series, crosstabs and pivots — each one a small Python class, each one chartable with a single line, in Highcharts, Chart.js or ApexCharts . Live Demo · Documentation · Quickstart One report class, every chart Declare the calculation once . Switch the visualization by changing a single argument — no new query, no new template. Why Django Slick Reporting? Every report shape — simple aggregates, group by, time series, crosstab/pivot, and combinations of them. Charts included…
read the full django-slick-reporting overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Business Intelligence & Reporting projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Business Intelligence & Reporting field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pixijs or django-slick-reporting more popular?
pixijs has 48,618 GitHub stars and django-slick-reporting has 604. pixijs has the larger community by that measure.
Are pixijs and django-slick-reporting free?
Both are open source. pixijs is licensed under MIT and django-slick-reporting under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pixijs and django-slick-reporting?
pixijs is written in TypeScript and django-slick-reporting in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pixijs or django-slick-reporting?
Choose pixijs if you want the larger community (48,618 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose django-slick-reporting if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.