head to head · open source

Phase vs Keyshade

Phase has 923 GitHub stars, 70 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Keyshade has 768 stars, 263 forks, 78 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Phase leads on adoption by 20% (923 vs 768 stars). Phase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Keyshade is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. Phase has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Keyshade 34%. Phase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Phase ★ 923 Keyshade ★ 768 category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Phase Keyshade
GitHub stars ★ 923 ★ 768
License Custom / other MPL-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-04-08
Forks ⑂ 70 ⑂ 263
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Phase if

  • You weight community size — 923 stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Phase profile →

pick Keyshade if

  • You want the Keyshade feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Keyshade fits your workflow better

full Keyshade profile →

About Phase

Phase is an open source secrets management platform, written in TypeScript, that lets fast moving engineering teams secure, deploy, and manage application secrets and environment variables from development through to production.

read the full Phase overview →

About Keyshade

Keyshade is an open source secret and configuration management tool that encrypts secrets with public key cryptography and pushes them to application runtimes in real time, built in TypeScript for teams that currently keep configuration in a cloud provider's dashboard.

read the full Keyshade overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K JumpServer ★ 32K

Related comparisons

puter vs phase puter vs keyshade mattermost vs phase puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey vault vs unkey puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat

More Secrets Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Secrets Management field.

Phase vs HashiCorp Vault Phase vs UnKey

Frequently asked questions

Is Phase or Keyshade more popular?

Phase has 923 GitHub stars and Keyshade has 768. Phase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Phase and Keyshade free?

Both are open source. Phase has no licence declared in this registry, and Keyshade is licensed under MPL-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Phase and Keyshade?

Phase is written in TypeScript and Keyshade in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Phase or Keyshade?

Choose Phase if you want the larger community (923 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Keyshade if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.