head to head · open source
PentestGPT vs Raccoon
PentestGPT has 16,254 GitHub stars, 2,844 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Raccoon has 4,066 stars, 500 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 300% (16,254 vs 4,066 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; Raccoon is written in Python under MIT. PentestGPT has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Raccoon 12%. PentestGPT was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PentestGPT | Raccoon | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 4.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 | 2026-04-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.8K | ⑂ 500 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PentestGPT if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Raccoon if
- You want the Raccoon feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Raccoon fits your workflow better
About PentestGPT
[![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![MIT License][license shield]][license url] [![Discord][discord shield]][discord url] PentestGPT AI Powered Autonomous Penetration Testing Agent Published at USENIX Security 2024 Official Website: pentestgpt.com » Research Paper · Report Bug · Request Feature Demo Installation Watch on YouTube PentestGPT in Action Watch on YouTube What's New in v1.0 (Agentic Upgrade) Multi Stage Pipeline The agent works through staged phases (recon →…
read the full PentestGPT overview →
About Raccoon
Raccoon Offensive Security Tool for Reconnaissance and Information Gathering Features [x] DNS details [x] DNS visual mapping using DNS dumpster [x] WHOIS information [x] TLS Data supported ciphers, TLS versions, certificate details and SANs [x] Port Scan [x] Services and scripts scan [x] URL fuzzing and dir/file detection [x] Subdomain enumeration uses Google dorking, DNS dumpster queries, SAN discovery and bruteforce [x] Web application data retrieval: CMS detection Web server info and X Powered By robots.txt and sitemap extraction Cookie inspection Extracts all fuzzable URLs Discovers HTML forms Retrieves all…
read the full Raccoon overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PentestGPT or Raccoon more popular?
PentestGPT has 16,254 GitHub stars and Raccoon has 4,066. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.
Are PentestGPT and Raccoon free?
Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and Raccoon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PentestGPT and Raccoon?
PentestGPT is written in Python and Raccoon in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PentestGPT or Raccoon?
Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (16,254 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Raccoon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.