head to head · open source

PentestGPT vs Raccoon

PentestGPT has 15,521 GitHub stars, 2,700 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Raccoon has 4,025 stars, 501 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 286% (15,521 vs 4,025 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; Raccoon is written in Python under MIT. PentestGPT has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, Raccoon 12%. PentestGPT was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PentestGPT ★ 16K Raccoon ★ 4.0K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

PentestGPT Raccoon
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 4.0K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-07-14 2026-04-21
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 501
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PentestGPT if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PentestGPT profile →

pick Raccoon if

  • You want the Raccoon feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Raccoon fits your workflow better

full Raccoon profile →

About PentestGPT

PentestGPT is an MIT licensed Python framework that uses large language models to run automated penetration tests and CTF challenges, aimed at penetration testers, security engineers and CTF players who want an agent to drive the tooling rather than working through it by hand.

read the full PentestGPT overview →

About Raccoon

Raccoon is an open source, MIT licensed offensive security tool written in Python for reconnaissance and information gathering, built for penetration testers, bug bounty hunters, and security analysts who need to map a target's DNS, TLS, network, and web footprint from a single command line.

read the full Raccoon overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs projectdiscovery mattermost vs projectdiscovery keycloak vs projectdiscovery tailscale vs projectdiscovery puter vs tracecat mattermost vs tracecat keycloak vs tracecat tailscale vs tracecat supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik better-auth vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

PentestGPT vs PayloadsAllTheThings PentestGPT vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills PentestGPT vs ProjectDiscovery PentestGPT vs pentagi PentestGPT vs vuls PentestGPT vs osv-scanner PentestGPT vs Nettacker PentestGPT vs GDA-android-reversing-Tool PentestGPT vs afrog PentestGPT vs Tracecat PentestGPT vs airgorah PentestGPT vs dockle

Frequently asked questions

Is PentestGPT or Raccoon more popular?

PentestGPT has 15,521 GitHub stars and Raccoon has 4,025. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.

Are PentestGPT and Raccoon free?

Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and Raccoon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PentestGPT and Raccoon?

PentestGPT is written in Python and Raccoon in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PentestGPT or Raccoon?

Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (15,521 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Raccoon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.