head to head · open source

PentestGPT vs pacu

PentestGPT has 15,652 GitHub stars, 2,722 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. pacu has 5,345 stars, 800 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 193% (15,652 vs 5,345 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; pacu is written in Python under BSD-3-Clause. PentestGPT has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, pacu 15%. PentestGPT was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (penetration-testing, python), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

PentestGPT ★ 16K pacu ★ 5.3K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

PentestGPT pacu
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 5.3K
License MIT BSD-3-Clause
Written in Python Python
Last push 2026-07-14 2026-05-19
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 800
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick PentestGPT if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full PentestGPT profile →

pick pacu if

  • You want the pacu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and pacu fits your workflow better

full pacu profile →

About PentestGPT

PentestGPT is an MIT licensed Python framework that uses large language models to run automated penetration tests and CTF challenges, aimed at penetration testers, security engineers and CTF players who want an agent to drive the tooling rather than working through it by hand.

read the full PentestGPT overview →

About pacu

Pacu is an open source AWS exploitation framework from Rhino Security Labs, built for penetration testers and offensive security teams who need to test the security of Amazon Web Services environments.

read the full pacu overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

PentestGPT vs PayloadsAllTheThings PentestGPT vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills PentestGPT vs ProjectDiscovery PentestGPT vs pentagi PentestGPT vs crowdsec PentestGPT vs Osintgram PentestGPT vs thc-hydra PentestGPT vs vuls PentestGPT vs osv-scanner PentestGPT vs rengine PentestGPT vs reconftw PentestGPT vs cve

Frequently asked questions

Is PentestGPT or pacu more popular?

PentestGPT has 15,652 GitHub stars and pacu has 5,345. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.

Are PentestGPT and pacu free?

Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and pacu under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between PentestGPT and pacu?

PentestGPT is written in Python and pacu in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, PentestGPT or pacu?

Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (15,652 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose pacu if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.