head to head · open source
PentestGPT vs artifact-keeper
PentestGPT has 16,332 GitHub stars, 2,858 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. artifact-keeper has 1,260 stars, 177 forks, 257 open issues and last shipped yesterday. PentestGPT leads on adoption by 1,196% (16,332 vs 1,260 stars). PentestGPT is written in Python under MIT; artifact-keeper is written in Rust under MIT. PentestGPT has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, artifact-keeper 14%. artifact-keeper was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PentestGPT | artifact-keeper | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-07-14 | 2026-11-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 177 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PentestGPT if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick artifact-keeper if
- You want the artifact-keeper feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and artifact-keeper fits your workflow better
About PentestGPT
[![Contributors][contributors shield]][contributors url] [![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![MIT License][license shield]][license url] [![Discord][discord shield]][discord url] PentestGPT AI Powered Autonomous Penetration Testing Agent Published at USENIX Security 2024 Official Website: pentestgpt.com » Research Paper · Report Bug · Request Feature Demo Installation Watch on YouTube PentestGPT in Action Watch on YouTube What's New in v1.0 (Agentic Upgrade) Multi Stage Pipeline The agent works through staged phases (recon →…
read the full PentestGPT overview →
About artifact-keeper
Artifact Keeper An enterprise grade, open source artifact registry supporting 45+ package formats . Built with Rust. Documentation Demo Website Highlights 45+ Package Formats Native protocol support for Maven, PyPI, NPM, Docker/OCI, Cargo, Go, Helm, and 38 more WASM Plugin System Extend with custom format handlers via WebAssembly (WIT based, Wasmtime runtime) Security Scanning Automated vulnerability detection with Trivy and Grype, policy engine, quarantine workflow Hardened Containers All images built on DISA STIG approved Red Hat UBI 9 base images, non root execution, no shell or package manager in runtime…
read the full artifact-keeper overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PentestGPT or artifact-keeper more popular?
PentestGPT has 16,332 GitHub stars and artifact-keeper has 1,260. PentestGPT has the larger community by that measure.
Are PentestGPT and artifact-keeper free?
Both are open source. PentestGPT is licensed under MIT and artifact-keeper under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PentestGPT and artifact-keeper?
PentestGPT is written in Python and artifact-keeper in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PentestGPT or artifact-keeper?
Choose PentestGPT if you want the larger community (16,332 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose artifact-keeper if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.