head to head · open source
PayloadsAllTheThings vs Raccoon
PayloadsAllTheThings has 82,315 GitHub stars, 17,560 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Raccoon has 4,064 stars, 500 forks, 14 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. PayloadsAllTheThings leads on adoption by 1,925% (82,315 vs 4,064 stars). PayloadsAllTheThings is written in Python under MIT; Raccoon is written in Python under MIT. PayloadsAllTheThings has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, Raccoon 12%. PayloadsAllTheThings was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (enumeration, hacking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PayloadsAllTheThings | Raccoon | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 82K | ★ 4.1K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-30 | 2026-04-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 18K | ⑂ 500 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PayloadsAllTheThings if
- You weight community size — 82K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Raccoon if
- You want the Raccoon feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Raccoon fits your workflow better
About PayloadsAllTheThings
Payloads All The Things A list of useful payloads and bypasses for Web Application Security. Feel free to improve with your payloads and techniques! You can also contribute with a :beers: IRL, or using the sponsor button. An alternative display version is available at PayloadsAllTheThingsWeb. :book: Documentation Every section contains the following files, you can use the template vuln folder to create a new chapter: README.md vulnerability description and how to exploit it, including several payloads Intruder a set of files to give to Burp Intruder Images pictures for the README.md Files some files referenced…
read the full PayloadsAllTheThings overview →
About Raccoon
Raccoon Offensive Security Tool for Reconnaissance and Information Gathering Features [x] DNS details [x] DNS visual mapping using DNS dumpster [x] WHOIS information [x] TLS Data supported ciphers, TLS versions, certificate details and SANs [x] Port Scan [x] Services and scripts scan [x] URL fuzzing and dir/file detection [x] Subdomain enumeration uses Google dorking, DNS dumpster queries, SAN discovery and bruteforce [x] Web application data retrieval: CMS detection Web server info and X Powered By robots.txt and sitemap extraction Cookie inspection Extracts all fuzzable URLs Discovers HTML forms Retrieves all…
read the full Raccoon overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PayloadsAllTheThings or Raccoon more popular?
PayloadsAllTheThings has 82,315 GitHub stars and Raccoon has 4,064. PayloadsAllTheThings has the larger community by that measure.
Are PayloadsAllTheThings and Raccoon free?
Both are open source. PayloadsAllTheThings is licensed under MIT and Raccoon under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between PayloadsAllTheThings and Raccoon?
PayloadsAllTheThings is written in Python and Raccoon in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PayloadsAllTheThings or Raccoon?
Choose PayloadsAllTheThings if you want the larger community (82,315 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Raccoon if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.