head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs sponge

OpenClaw has 389,982 GitHub stars, 81,978 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. sponge has 2,867 stars, 271 forks, 42 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 13,502% (389,982 vs 2,867 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; sponge is written in Go under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, sponge 9%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 390K sponge ★ 2.9K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw sponge
GitHub stars ★ 390K ★ 2.9K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-12-15
Forks ⑂ 82K ⑂ 271
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 390K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick sponge if

  • You want the sponge feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and sponge fits your workflow better

full sponge profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About sponge

Sponge is a Go development framework for building backend services through code generation. It lives in the Go ecosystem and integrates Gin, gRPC, GORM, and Protobuf. The project parses definitions written in SQL, Protobuf, or JSON configuration files into modular service code.

read the full sponge overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent OpenClaw vs Open WebUI OpenClaw vs LobeChat OpenClaw vs AnythingLLM OpenClaw vs Cherry Studio OpenClaw vs nanobot OpenClaw vs Jan OpenClaw vs LibreChat OpenClaw vs chatbox OpenClaw vs AstrBot OpenClaw vs openhuman OpenClaw vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or sponge more popular?

OpenClaw has 389,982 GitHub stars and sponge has 2,867. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and sponge free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw has no licence declared in this registry, and sponge is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and sponge?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and sponge in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or sponge?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (389,982 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose sponge if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.