head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs oriveo

OpenClaw has 391,551 GitHub stars, 82,292 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped today. oriveo has 536 stars, 10 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 72,951% (391,551 vs 536 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; oriveo is written in Swift under AGPL-3.0. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, oriveo 2%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 392K oriveo ★ 536 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw oriveo
GitHub stars ★ 392K ★ 536
License MIT AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-10-10 2026-10-10
Forks ⑂ 82K ⑂ 10
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 392K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick oriveo if

  • You want the oriveo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and oriveo fits your workflow better

full oriveo profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About oriveo

Oriveo is an open source, bring your own key AI chat client for iOS, Android and the web that lets you talk to fifteen model providers and any compatible local endpoint from one app, using your own API keys and keeping your conversations on your own device.

read the full oriveo overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Hermes Agent ★ 252K Ollama ★ 183K ponytail ★ 160K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K langchain ★ 148K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent OpenClaw vs Open WebUI OpenClaw vs ComfyUI OpenClaw vs odysseus OpenClaw vs LobeChat OpenClaw vs AnythingLLM OpenClaw vs Cherry Studio OpenClaw vs nanobot OpenClaw vs LibreChat OpenClaw vs Jan OpenClaw vs chatbox OpenClaw vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or oriveo more popular?

OpenClaw has 391,551 GitHub stars and oriveo has 536. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and oriveo free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and oriveo under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and oriveo?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and oriveo in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or oriveo?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (391,551 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose oriveo if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.