head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs openilink-hub
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openilink-hub has 1,605 stars, 150 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 24,433% (393,747 vs 1,605 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; openilink-hub is written in Go under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, openilink-hub 9%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | openilink-hub | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 394K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 83K | ⑂ 150 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openilink-hub if
- You want the openilink-hub feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and openilink-hub fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About openilink-hub
免责声明 ：本项目基于公开的 iLink 协议进行独立开发，仅供学习交流与技术研究使用。项目与 iLink 协议的官方团队无任何关联或授权关系。若相关权利方认为本项目存在侵权，请通过 Issue 联系我们，我们将在确认后第一时间予以下架处理。 Disclaimer: This project is independently developed based on the publicly available iLink protocol for learning and research purposes only. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the official iLink team. If any rights holder believes this project infringes upon their rights, please contact us via an Issue and we will take it down promptly upon confirmation. 微信 ClawBot iLink 协议的开源消息管理平台 + App 应用市场 Open source message management platform + App Marketplace for WeChat ClawBot (iLink protocol)…
read the full openilink-hub overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or openilink-hub more popular?
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and openilink-hub has 1,605. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and openilink-hub free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and openilink-hub under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and openilink-hub?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and openilink-hub in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or openilink-hub?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openilink-hub if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.