head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs openilink-hub

OpenClaw has 390,029 GitHub stars, 81,995 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openilink-hub has 1,579 stars, 140 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 24,601% (390,029 vs 1,579 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; openilink-hub is written in Go under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, openilink-hub 9%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 390K openilink-hub ★ 1.6K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw openilink-hub
GitHub stars ★ 390K ★ 1.6K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-18
Forks ⑂ 82K ⑂ 140
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 390K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick openilink-hub if

  • You want the openilink-hub feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and openilink-hub fits your workflow better

full openilink-hub profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About openilink-hub

OpeniLink Hub is a self hosted, MIT licensed WeChat bot management platform with a built in app marketplace, built for developers, operators and teams who want to run and extend WeChat bots through a web console instead of writing raw protocol code.

read the full openilink-hub overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph hermes-agent vs opencode hermes-agent vs n8n ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all llama-cpp vs vllm n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent OpenClaw vs Open WebUI OpenClaw vs odysseus OpenClaw vs LobeChat OpenClaw vs AnythingLLM OpenClaw vs Cherry Studio OpenClaw vs nanobot OpenClaw vs Jan OpenClaw vs LibreChat OpenClaw vs chatbox OpenClaw vs AstrBot OpenClaw vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or openilink-hub more popular?

OpenClaw has 390,029 GitHub stars and openilink-hub has 1,579. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and openilink-hub free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw has no licence declared in this registry, and openilink-hub is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and openilink-hub?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and openilink-hub in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or openilink-hub?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (390,029 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose openilink-hub if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.