head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs openbrowserclaw
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openbrowserclaw has 604 stars, 82 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 65,090% (393,747 vs 604 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; openbrowserclaw is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, openbrowserclaw 14%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (openclaw), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | openbrowserclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 394K | ★ 604 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 83K | ⑂ 82 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openbrowserclaw if
- You want the openbrowserclaw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and openbrowserclaw fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About openbrowserclaw
OpenBrowserClaw Disclaimer: OpenBrowserClaw is a personal, open source project. It is not affiliated with any cryptocurrency, meme coin, token, or social media account. If you see coins, tokens, or social media profiles claiming association with this project, they are not legitimate and are not endorsed by the author(s). Stay safe and do your own research. Browser native personal AI assistant. Zero infrastructure — the browser is the server. Built as a browser only reimagination of NanoClaw. Same philosophy, small enough to understand, built for one user, but running entirely in a browser tab. Quick Start Open…
read the full openbrowserclaw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or openbrowserclaw more popular?
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and openbrowserclaw has 604. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and openbrowserclaw free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and openbrowserclaw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and openbrowserclaw?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and openbrowserclaw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or openbrowserclaw?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose openbrowserclaw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.