head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs open-spaces

OpenClaw has 391,465 GitHub stars, 82,298 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. open-spaces has 3,394 stars, 496 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 11,434% (391,465 vs 3,394 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; open-spaces is written in JavaScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, open-spaces 15%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 391K open-spaces ★ 3.4K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw open-spaces
GitHub stars ★ 391K ★ 3.4K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-08 2026-10-08
Forks ⑂ 82K ⑂ 496
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 391K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick open-spaces if

  • You want the open-spaces feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and open-spaces fits your workflow better

full open-spaces profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About open-spaces

OpenSpaces is a free, MIT licensed, self hostable AI workspace that brings shared Spaces, editable pages, conversations, and AI tools into one application, aimed at individuals and teams who want an open alternative to ChatGPT Spaces running on their own infrastructure.

read the full open-spaces overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Hermes Agent ★ 252K Ollama ★ 182K ponytail ★ 158K Dify ★ 158K Open WebUI ★ 154K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent OpenClaw vs Open WebUI OpenClaw vs ComfyUI OpenClaw vs odysseus OpenClaw vs LobeChat OpenClaw vs AnythingLLM OpenClaw vs Cherry Studio OpenClaw vs nanobot OpenClaw vs LibreChat OpenClaw vs Jan OpenClaw vs chatbox OpenClaw vs openhuman

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or open-spaces more popular?

OpenClaw has 391,465 GitHub stars and open-spaces has 3,394. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and open-spaces free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and open-spaces under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and open-spaces?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and open-spaces in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or open-spaces?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (391,465 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose open-spaces if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.