head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs node-telegram-bot-api
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. node-telegram-bot-api has 9,216 stars, 1,646 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 4,172% (393,747 vs 9,216 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; node-telegram-bot-api is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, node-telegram-bot-api 18%. node-telegram-bot-api was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | node-telegram-bot-api | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 394K | ★ 9.2K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 83K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick node-telegram-bot-api if
- You want the node-telegram-bot-api feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and node-telegram-bot-api fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About node-telegram-bot-api
✨ A Modern Telegram Bot API Library ✨ v2 is a from scratch redesign, no v1 compatibility. Coming from v1? See the v1 v2 migration guide in the changelog. 📦 Install Runs on Bun, modern Node.js, Deno, Cloudflare Workers and Vercel Functions λ 🚀 Usage 📡 Calling the API directly Api mirrors the wire API 1:1 one method per Bot API method, each taking a single params object. 🧩 Middleware koa style middleware around every update; on / command / hears are filters in the same chain. Wrap downstream work with await next() . ⌨️ Keyboards & formatting Structured fields are plain typed objects pass a literal or use a…
read the full node-telegram-bot-api overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or node-telegram-bot-api more popular?
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and node-telegram-bot-api has 9,216. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and node-telegram-bot-api free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and node-telegram-bot-api under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and node-telegram-bot-api?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and node-telegram-bot-api in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or node-telegram-bot-api?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose node-telegram-bot-api if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.