head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs ctxport
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ctxport has 653 stars, 135 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 60,198% (393,747 vs 653 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; ctxport is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, ctxport 21%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | ctxport | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 394K | ★ 653 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-03-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 83K | ⑂ 135 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick ctxport if
- You want the ctxport feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and ctxport fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About ctxport
CtxPort One click. Structured Markdown. Any AI conversation. Your AI conversations deserve a better clipboard. 简体中文 English Supported Platforms Get Started · Features · Documentation The Problem You just spent 45 minutes in a deep conversation with ChatGPT. You found the perfect architecture for your project. Now you need to share it with Claude for implementation. What do you do? Ctrl+A, Ctrl+C? You get a mess of HTML artifacts, broken formatting, and missing code blocks. Copy each message manually? Life is too short. Screenshot it? Text in images is where knowledge goes to die. AI conversations are the new…
read the full ctxport overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or ctxport more popular?
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and ctxport has 653. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and ctxport free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and ctxport under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and ctxport?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and ctxport in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or ctxport?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ctxport if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.