head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs Corpus

OpenClaw has 389,982 GitHub stars, 81,978 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Corpus has 13 stars, 0 forks, 25 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 2,999,762% (389,982 vs 13 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Corpus is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, Corpus 0%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 390K Corpus ★ 13 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw Corpus
GitHub stars ★ 390K ★ 13
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-26
Forks ⑂ 82K ⑂ 0
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 390K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick Corpus if

  • You want the Corpus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Corpus fits your workflow better

full Corpus profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About Corpus

Corpus is an open source, self hosted document Q&A system that ingests PDFs and web pages, answers natural language questions with citations back to source text, and is aimed at teams and individuals who need grounded answers across a private document collection rather than across the public web.

read the full Corpus overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Hermes Agent ★ 246K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent OpenClaw vs Open WebUI OpenClaw vs LobeChat OpenClaw vs AnythingLLM OpenClaw vs Cherry Studio OpenClaw vs nanobot OpenClaw vs Jan OpenClaw vs LibreChat OpenClaw vs chatbox OpenClaw vs AstrBot OpenClaw vs openhuman OpenClaw vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or Corpus more popular?

OpenClaw has 389,982 GitHub stars and Corpus has 13. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and Corpus free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw has no licence declared in this registry, and Corpus is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and Corpus?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and Corpus in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or Corpus?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (389,982 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Corpus if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.