head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs codex-mobile
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. codex-mobile has 978 stars, 205 forks, 44 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 40,160% (393,747 vs 978 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; codex-mobile is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, codex-mobile 21%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | codex-mobile | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 394K | ★ 978 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 83K | ⑂ 205 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codex-mobile if
- You want the codex-mobile feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codex-mobile fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About codex-mobile
🔥 codexapp 🚀 Run Codex App UI Anywhere: Linux, Windows, or Termux on Android 🚀 Codex UI in your browser. No drama. One command. Yes, that is your Codex desktop app experience exposed over web UI. Yes, it runs cross platform. 🤯 What Is This? codexapp is a lightweight bridge that gives you a browser accessible UI for Codex app server workflows. You run one command. It starts a local web server. You open it from your machine, your LAN, or wherever your setup allows. TL;DR 🧠: Codex app UI, unlocked for Linux, Windows, and Termux powered Android setups. ⚡ Quick Start The main event. By default, codexapp now also…
read the full codex-mobile overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or codex-mobile more popular?
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and codex-mobile has 978. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and codex-mobile free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and codex-mobile under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and codex-mobile?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and codex-mobile in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or codex-mobile?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codex-mobile if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.