head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs claude-chat-exporter

OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. claude-chat-exporter has 741 stars, 85 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 53,037% (393,747 vs 741 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; claude-chat-exporter is written in JavaScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, claude-chat-exporter 11%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 394K claude-chat-exporter ★ 741 category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw claude-chat-exporter
GitHub stars ★ 394K ★ 741
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-10-23
Forks ⑂ 83K ⑂ 85
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick claude-chat-exporter if

  • You want the claude-chat-exporter feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and claude-chat-exporter fits your workflow better

full claude-chat-exporter profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About claude-chat-exporter

Claude Chat Exporter A privacy first tool that exports your Claude.ai conversations to clean Markdown. It runs entirely in your browser — no server of its own, nothing uploaded, no tracking. Everything comes through — tables, math and code at full fidelity, plus artifacts, created files, charts and attachments — all read directly from Claude's own API. Exports carry YAML frontmatter with one heading per turn, so they drop straight into an Obsidian vault or a RAG pipeline. Claude's internal API changes without notice, and someone has to keep up. Sponsoring this project is what keeps it maintained. More → ⚡ One…

read the full claude-chat-exporter overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Related comparisons

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or claude-chat-exporter more popular?

OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and claude-chat-exporter has 741. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and claude-chat-exporter free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and claude-chat-exporter under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and claude-chat-exporter?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and claude-chat-exporter in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or claude-chat-exporter?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose claude-chat-exporter if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.