head to head · open source

OpenClaw vs chatgpt_telegram_bot

OpenClaw has 390,029 GitHub stars, 81,995 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped today. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,527 stars, 1,916 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 6,957% (390,029 vs 5,527 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 35%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenClaw ★ 390K chatgpt_telegram_bot ★ 5.5K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenClaw chatgpt_telegram_bot
GitHub stars ★ 390K ★ 5.5K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-14
Forks ⑂ 82K ⑂ 1.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenClaw if

  • You weight community size — 390K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenClaw profile →

pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if

  • You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better

full chatgpt_telegram_bot profile →

About OpenClaw

OpenClaw is an open source, self hosted AI assistant in the AI & Machine Learning / AI Interaction & Interfaces category that runs on hardware the user controls and meets them inside the messaging channels they already use, for individuals who want a personal assistant on a laptop and teams that want a shared deployment.

read the full OpenClaw overview →

About chatgpt_telegram_bot

chatgpt telegram bot is an MIT licensed Python bot that places OpenAI's GPT models and Anthropic's Claude models inside Telegram using your own API keys, aimed at individuals and teams who want fast, uncapped model access without living in a browser tab.

read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 156K Open WebUI ★ 152K langchain ★ 147K ponytail ★ 141K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs cherry-studio openclaw vs nanobot openclaw vs jan openclaw vs librechat ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai llama-cpp vs vllm ollama vs pageindex ollama vs langfuse dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail langchain vs ponytail dify vs graphify langchain vs graphify ponytail vs graphify dify vs claude-mem dify vs ragflow

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

OpenClaw vs Hermes Agent OpenClaw vs Open WebUI OpenClaw vs LobeChat OpenClaw vs AnythingLLM OpenClaw vs Cherry Studio OpenClaw vs nanobot OpenClaw vs Jan OpenClaw vs LibreChat OpenClaw vs chatbox OpenClaw vs AstrBot OpenClaw vs openhuman OpenClaw vs Langchain-Chatchat

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenClaw or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?

OpenClaw has 390,029 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,527. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenClaw and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?

Both are open source. OpenClaw has no licence declared in this registry, and chatgpt_telegram_bot is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between OpenClaw and chatgpt_telegram_bot?

OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenClaw or chatgpt_telegram_bot?

Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (390,029 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.